Human senses

When we talk about things that common human senses can percept (sound, colour, smell, touch, taste) they are just collection of things that people know of world around them, and they are able to make opinions on them. Ppl can be very divided in opinions about favourite colour but some things are very generalized, like opinion of most peoples about going into bath with piranes or nude swiming in lava. Humans see parts of nature and interpret it on a similar way. They make different opinions but not as much because of physics as much because of their innate senses - mind. There is great part of nature that cannot be seen other way but through various kind of machinery. AND there is still great part of nature that cannot be seen anyhow.

Colour and light

Now about colour and light. Physicaly, that are two opposite things:

While light is *additive*, colour is *subtractive*. What I mean?

Light have three basis components: Red, Green and Blue. I won't talk much about getting white light by sending R,G and B lights to same place. More lights you mix, light is closer to white. At the other side, Red, Green and Blue light have its oppose:

Red - Cyan
Green - Magenta
Blue - Yellow

so, that is famous CMYK printing system that involves one more colour - black, because it would be very expensive (but also very available) to create black from mix of C,M'n'Y printer colours. Now, if you are not already introduced to this matter you'd like to know which is connection between these three pair of colours. Here is:

- Cyan colour is specific by that it reflects all lights except Red.
(Same for Magenta and Green; and Yellow and Blue.)

Practicaly: If I send white light through yellow coloured filter, then let it pass cyan coloured filter, I'd get green light. Moreover: Red light would get cyan shadow (strange?), and inverse: Cyan light would get Red shadow. Purple light would get green shadow etc.

There is a more larger spectre of colors that we cannot see. So I let other to let their mind loose in furter saga about light. I get tired.

Slowing, Stopping, Reverting and Hasting (?) time

We are beings that live in our three dimensions (of movement) and we are able to make relative moves in any direction but we pay cost by being exposed to one more axis that we cannot control in total: the time. I'm unsure if it allows movement or not but it bring some cosequences that I don't must name. Why I said "not in total"? Apperently, if you move faster your time pass slower. Science is not sure but, there's a theories about that on relative speeds near to the speed of light time process goes reversibile (time goes back), but - still there is not mech nor man that could take that speeds. Far from that. So, we can slow (very true) time but cannot stop or revert it - for now.

One thing is obvious: if time-passing process can be reverted (very questionable), it can be stopped in bordermoment when it no more go forward nor backward; but ONLY for those who reach enough speed. Not for ALL universe (Thing that we talked about is a bit different - absolute stopping time should be more much expensive, ... (prev. post)). Science cannot afford any of these two options for now.

About Franny, Mole and Derf. Hmm... I think that ppl who *stop* time by reaching enough speed could move and live (they just cannot become older) in these little timestop. Otherwise, if you freeze universe there will not be chances for move because freezing all movement involves all human - physical and psychic as well. Even if you can move then you must move other matery and other matery must move other matery... at end you will have to move all universe (well... great part 'cos of black wholes). About dying in that condition (Satis)... maybe yes, maybe no... probably no. I'm too overdriven by this day to think about that now.

ATTENTION: (It is maybe idiotic but "just in case...")
Never heard science talk about hasting the time (making it pass faster). Have you heard some sci talking about that?