I hear you on the money thing. The time thing, not so much... I may not get as much vacation as half you euros, but I get enough that I could float this. Spend a week in Europe... hells yea... start off at Kiev and Chernobyl, then go to St. Petersburg for two days, then Moscow for two days, then maybe 2 days in Berlin or something. That'd be awesome. Except for the expense. I bet you that'd run over $5k per person. And I doubt Shiny would be cool with being left behind.
Statistics: Posted by Satis — Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:06 pm
]]>
]]>
It's something that's on my check list to do in my life time but yeah, cost is the only reason I'm not doing it right now.
Statistics: Posted by Mole — Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:22 am
]]>
http://wikitravel.org/en/Chernobyl
There's a list of websites and stuff up there.
The biggest expense for me would be the flight. It would probably be quite a bit less expensive for you folks, since you don't have as far to fly.
Statistics: Posted by Satis — Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:31 am
]]>
Is there a site that offers tours or something Satis?
Statistics: Posted by Rinox — Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:29 am
]]>
As for nuclear power, it's pretty safe now, and in comparison to fossil fuels, it's clean as hell. I have no problem with nuclear power.
Statistics: Posted by Satis — Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:03 pm
]]>
I'd love to visit too, but according to some posts down on that thread if you want to go you better go soon - they're developing whatever they can apparently, so it won't be that way forever.
It's mad to think that some of those things on the tables were probably just left that way; absolutely amazing.
And I agree about the whole nuclear energy is a good thing; like you said if we fuck up it's us that get the problems - not nature. It doesn't really matter even if nature did get weird mutations, because if all the humans were gone at least nature could have it's own way.
Still, somewhere I'd love to go
Statistics: Posted by Mole — Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:14 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>