 | | |
| Satis wrote: I don't think I understand what you mean by a 360 degree rendering. I mean, most (if not all) of my 3d programs allow rendering of a 360 degree panorama. | |
| | |
Now I don't understand what you talking about.
Can you post some idle screenie?
| ClanKiller.com http://forums.clankiller.com/ |
|
| Satis? http://forums.clankiller.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=650 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | RB [ Fri Jan 16, 2004 12:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Satis? |
By things I got from this forum (I never had time to search your own site) I can conclude you're one 3D artist or similar or more in 3D world. I hope you remember my story of all-seeing eye (FOV=360deg), yes? That thing was (and it is and it will be) my obsession for last 1.5 years but, it seems others are not much interested in experimenting with such a things. So, I must ask you: didn't you feel challenged against ability to render pure (not deformed as it seems at first info) scenes with FOV=360deg? What you think about that at all? |
|
| Author: | Satis [ Fri Jan 16, 2004 11:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't think I understand what you mean by a 360 degree rendering. I mean, most (if not all) of my 3d programs allow rendering of a 360 degree panorama. Of course, either that ends up with a twisted, distorted but regular-size picture, or a really long one. If you mean more along the lines of virtual reality, I very much like VR. I don't know much about it, though... I can create 3d scenes and whatnot, but not real virtual reality. |
|
| Author: | RB [ Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:50 am ] | |||||||||
| Post subject: | ||||||||||
Now I don't understand what you talking about. Can you post some idle screenie? |
||||||||||
| Author: | derf [ Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think GFree is trying to describe an application that creates just a normal, front and human like view of a 3D image. Whereas i think Satis is trying to describe an application that scans a room/place at a 360degs and then makes one long but short image of the horizontal scan. |
|
| Author: | Satis [ Fri Jan 23, 2004 8:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ah, ok. I haven't gotten around to doing this yet. No time. Please remind me if I forget... I'll do a 3d render of what I'm talking about. |
|
| Author: | RB [ Sat Jan 24, 2004 3:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sorry, Satis. Never meant to ruin your personal peace. I (earlier) got you are bussy with some job(s) that are not so fun for your taste. I'll post some screenies when do birocraty jobs about writting documentation and registering product in Government district (It would be cheaper than 5000gp  ). Then I would cast it out freely.
|
|
| Author: | RB [ Mon Mar 15, 2004 1:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ok this is what I meant by fov:360x90. If you wanna more screenies or to show what you have about this matter, feel free to post it here. Directory with samples. Satis, you said me to remind you to render something with fov:360 in your rendering software and whatever it is. Have you time now? |
|
| Author: | derf [ Mon Mar 15, 2004 4:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
unlikely, the bastard still hasnt done the quick reply thing yet. Ill have to book you in for 15th June 2012. Is that ok? |
|
| Author: | Satis [ Mon Mar 15, 2004 8:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
nope, haven't done it, though I did play with it. I'm not sure if I can do it in Cinema4d. Been so long isnce I touched that one I don't know if I remember how to use it. Bryce, it can't be done directly. However, I can set the FOV to 180, then do two renders opposite one another and stitch the two images together in a paint program. Same effect, I think. |
|
| Author: | Satis [ Mon Mar 22, 2004 7:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ok, I lied, Bryce does allow you to do it directly. As proof, I'm uploading a render. I scattered objects all around the camera and did a 360 degree panoramic render. I'm also adding a link to a quicktime VR rendering I did of the same scene. It's about 1MB and you have to have quicktime installed to view it, but it'll let you move the camera around so you can see the limitations of the render. There is a little bit of area straight down and straight up that's not seeable, but it's a pretty small area. QVR file |
|
| Author: | RB [ Tue Mar 23, 2004 6:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
This image say it exist but hardly give some clue how it works. Can you render in wireframe with camera inside of hi-polygon Box and hi-polygon Sphere, plese? |
|
| Author: | Satis [ Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm sorry, I can't. I tried, and I can 'sorta' get a wireframe, but it doesn't work right. Also, there's so little wire in it that it's basically worthless. |
|
| Author: | RB [ Mon Apr 05, 2004 12:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Then, can you tell me how goes real time rendering there? I mean: like in games. |
|
| Author: | Satis [ Mon Apr 05, 2004 8:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
err, I have no idea what you're talking about, sorry. As far as the 360 degree panorama thing, I could render a movie out of it. Of course, it'll be huge, and I know your bandwidth/storage constraints. |
|
| Author: | RB [ Thu Apr 08, 2004 3:35 am ] | |||||||||
| Post subject: | ||||||||||
How much time you need to generate one frame ... or maybe: how much frames you can generate per second - - if you render scene with approx. 1800 polygones, without antialiasing and vertical sync (if use OpenGL); by using lightmapping and up to ~30MB textures? |
||||||||||
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|