ClanKiller.com http://forums.clankiller.com/ |
|
Circumcision More Effective Than Condoms http://forums.clankiller.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1790 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | ElevenBravo [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:46 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Circumcision More Effective Than Condoms | |||||||||
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medical ... d=rssfeeds |
Author: | Satis [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
wtf does circumcision have to do with transmitting/receiving AIDS? That makes no sense to me. |
Author: | ElevenBravo [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:59 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | |||||||||||||||||||
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... printableL |
Author: | Arathorn [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:53 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I don't understand how less contact with white blood cells is better then no contact with them. |
Author: | Rinox [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:22 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I dunno...as an auto-immunity killing virus, it makes some sense that it would 'prefer' white bloodcells. As far as I know anything of medical science. From what I've read, circumcisions are good for just about anything. Less chance of infections, less chance of getting nasty veneral diseases, more staying power (apparently) and a generally more esthetic view, according to some women. But fuck getting a circumcision...no one comes near my penis with a sharp stabby object. |
Author: | pevil [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:35 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Ok that makes no sense to me... not that I bothered reading it yet But I thought the whole point of condoms was that theres no, er... fluid exchanges, which is how most stds are passed on. Now maybe circumcision WITH condoms would be better than just condoms. But not without, surely. |
Author: | derf [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:09 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I think 11b may mean: It would be more reliable to circumcise every male in Africa, rather than making condoms freely available, to stop the spread of HIV. |
Author: | ElevenBravo [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:57 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | ||||||||||
Thats what the article and study is saying yes. And just out of curriostiy, who else here besides Rinox is not circumcised? Most circumcisions happen when the child is a baby. |
Author: | Arathorn [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:30 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm not. Only jews and perhaps muslims are circumsized. Probably has something to do with the climate there. It probably isn't nice to get desert sand cought behind your foreskin. Not much of a problem in the rainy forests of Germania. But even if circumcision helps against HIV, does it help against other STD's? It would be bad if people in Afrika would start thinking they can do everything when circumcized, only to create a new epidemy. I don't even think AIDS is the biggest problem of Afrika, it's more that everybody there fucks around without protection. |
Author: | Rinox [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:20 am ] |
Post subject: | |
You're right Arathorn, according to this study in American men there is little correspondence between (general) venereal disease and circumcision http://chronicle.uchicago.edu/970403/circumcision.shtml They do reveal some other interesting things tho, like that 81% of white males in America has had a circumcision. Statistically, that gives a +- 30% chance that Satis, 11B and Pig all have circumsized penises. Rejoice! I love this topic. |
Author: | tyranus [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:32 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | ||||||||||
its not only jews and muslims, some people have to have it done for medical reasons *cough* |
Author: | pevil [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:20 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm not! |
Author: | Satis [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:23 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm un. I was born in Germany. Any let me tell you that some women (American women) are quite fascinated with it. Anyway, I understand what the study is saying, but maybe they should just start mandatory HIV testing in Africa and move all HIV+ people to their own little community. That is extremely wrong, but if the goal is to stop the spread of HIV regardless of the cost, that's the way to do it. Either that or kill them. Or chop off their penii. |
Author: | Myrddin L'argenton [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:25 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I nearly was when I was a baby no way is it going to happen now tho. But I don't understand this. If the virus gets into the blood stream isn't it going to infect the person anyway. Yes this is technical but the penis is engorged with blood whilst sex is going on and there is always white blood cells in the bloodstream, especially if there is a cut around the place. So circumcision shouldn't really affect this. TBH tho fidelity is merely an option. The best ways is to be aware and regular tests for HIV as well as wearing condoms. Fidelity does help but some people might not want that. For those that don't want one partner there should be other choices. |
Author: | RB [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:44 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | ||||||||||
Really... ? LÖL! Satis, das in Deutschland geborene Kind. Was werde ich noch hier hören... aja die Rolle der Beschneidung bezüglich HIV... ... I must have drunk too much beer. |
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |